Our decarbonisation transition plan

Goal: We target an 80% reduction in scope 1 & 2 carbon footprint by 2030 compared to the 2022 baseline.
We define the baseline as the carbon footprint of underlying funds' benchmarks thereby measuring the emission performance of the Cushon Sustainable Investment Strategy against the broader economy. In the following, we explain the pathway to achieving this target.
Targets
Emission Metrics
Setting a decarbonisation target requires measuring the portfolio's carbon emissions. The most commonly used portfolio emission metrics are:
Total carbon emissions represent the absolute financed emissions of a portfolio measured in tCO2e. Emissions are attributed based on an equity ownership approach, i.e., if a portfolio owns x% of a company, then it finances x% of the company's total greenhouse gas emissions.
(The equity ownership approach is generalised to non-equity holdings by attributing emissions across the total capital structure of the invested company.) Total carbon emissions represent a portfolio's emissions in absolute terms. To compare emissions between different portfolios so-called “intensity based metrics” which normalise the total carbon emissions are used:
Carbon footprint (aka EVIC intensity) are the total carbon emissions divided by the portfolio value.
It represents the financed emissions per unit of investment in a portfolio. The carbon footprint is the
recommended metric by DWP and most commonly used by UK master trusts.
Carbon intensity (aka revenue intensity) are the total carbon emissions divided by the weighted
average portfolio revenue. It represents the financed emissions per unit of revenue.
Weighted average carbon intensity (WACI) represents the emissions per unit of revenue
weighted by the value of each company in the portfolio. Note that, contrary to the carbon
footprint and carbon intensity, WACI does not use the equity ownership approach.

$In line with the broader industry we set a decarbonisation target for the carbon footprint of our portfolio. However, it should be noted that: - the equity ownership approach links financed emissions to valuations of the underlying companies. Consequently, the carbon footprint can change both due to decarbonisation of the underlying companies and due to changes in their valuations. - the carbon footprint does not capture the emission efficiency of companies, i.e., the emissions per unit of output. The carbon intensity accounts for a form of emission efficiency by normalising the total carbon emissions by revenue. - the metrics are a point-in-time snapshot of the emission intensity of a portfolio. They do not in themselves provide any insight into the decarbonisation pathways of the portfolio or the underlying companies. A credible decarbonisation pathway has to account for companies' ability to achieve future emission reductions. It is therefore important to not rely on a single metric to analyse and compare portfolios' emission performance. Cushon's Decarbonisation Pathway We target an 80% reduction in the carbon footprint (scope 1 \& 2) by 2030. The pathway to achieving this target is outlined in this section. There are two main drivers of portfolio decarbonisation: First, the overall carbon footprint depends on the footprints of the underlying funds. For example, the Macquarie True Index implements a 7% annual reduction in carbon emissions. Second, the portfolio's carbon footprint also changes because of changes in the asset allocation. For example, the inclusion of the low-carbon Schroders Climate+ fund is expected to significantly reduce the carbon footprint of the overall portfolio$

Portfolio and Real-World Decarbonisation
It is important to note that our priority is decarbonisation of the real economy rather than simply reducing financed emissions of the portfolio. Cushon believes that in some circumstances exclusion can be the best way of achieving real-world change and in others
supporting real-world transition is appropriate. The Schroders Climate+ fund illustrates that emission reductions and real-world decarbonisation can also be aligned. However, we do not shy away from investing in today’s high emitting companies if they have credible decarbonisation plans to align themselves with net zero.
For example, the Lombard Odier Target Net Zero fund contributes almost 20% to the overall carbon footprint but constitutes only 5% of the portfolio. It is however expected to materially drive real-world decarbonisation by investing in companies developing low-carbon
technologies in high-emitting sectors.
This is why a nuanced approach to measuring portfolio decarbonisation is necessary. The tension between lowering the portfolio's carbon footprint and investing in the most material decarbonisation in the real economy can be reconciled by means of granular sectoral targets. Beyond the portfolio and fund-level decarbonisation pathways covered in this document, we intend to disclose detailed sector targets covering our investments in the near future.

Portfolio Emission Volatility
While the design of the Cushon Sustainable Investment Strategy can credibly deliver the targeted decarbonisation by 2030, short-term volatility in the emission metrics is expected.
On the one hand, the equity ownership approach means that company valuations affect the portfolio's emission intensity. For example, although the emissions of the Macquarie True Index decreased by more than 7% between 2021 and 2022, its carbon footprint increased because of the decline in valuations.
On the other, the most material real-world decarbonisation can often be achieved by investing in the high-emitting companies who are aligning themselves with net zero. For example, Lombard Odier invested in an electric utility company with ambitious decarbonisation targets which increased the carbon footprint compared to the previous year without significantly altering the portfolio's forward-looking emissions.
Lastly, the reported carbon metrics are sensitive to the coverage and quality of the underlying emission data. While the coverage of our portfolio is already approximately 94% in 2022, we work on further improvements of the data coverage quality with a particular focus on the independent verification of reported emissions and improved estimation methodologies to fill in gaps in the data.

Pathways of Underlying Fund
The pathway is informed by the design of the underlying funds which can be broadly grouped into three categories:
Passive tilts
The Macquarie True Index targets an ongoing annual emission reduction of at least 7%. The carbon emissions of the index are calculated by weighting the emissions of the underlying companies in the index by their index weight.
In particular, no equity ownership approach is used. The ongoing decarbonisation of the index can be achieved by means of either the underlying companies decarbonising or further tilts away from high-emitting
companies. This means that the index could become less diversified if the pace of decarbonisation of the underlying companies is too slow. We closely monitor the index composition, its emission distribution and its level of diversification compared to a market-capitalisation weighted benchmark.
The LGIM Future World GBP Corporate Bond Index tilts to companies with a higher LGIM Issuer ESG score and achieves an immediate emission reduction of 50% compared to the benchmark. While no explicit annual reduction target is implemented in the index, the tilting is expected to favour companies with lower emissions and better transition plans to achieve ongoing reductions.
Impact
The Schroders Climate+ is designed as a net negative carbon portfolio, i.e., the sum of negative and avoided emissions exceeds the fund's total carbon emissions. Note that
carbon credits generated by negative or avoided emissions only offset the fund's total carbon emissions if they are retired within the fund. If they are sold by the fund, the offsets will be claimed by their buyers and thus cannot be counted towards the fund's carbon footprint. However, because of its focus on climate change mitigation and adaptation the funds' carbon footprint gross of any avoided or negative emissions is small.
The Wellington Global Impact Bond Fund is expected to achieve a 50% carbon footprint reduction by 2030 compared to 2019. Because of its focus on social and climate impact, the fund's carbon footprint is already extremely low and unlikely to be a material concern for our overall target.
Transition
The Lombard Odier Target Net Zero Fund is focussed on driving real-world decarbonisation by investing in the companies with credible plans to align with net zero. It targets a 50% carbon footprint reduction by 2030 compared to 2019. The fund is a material driver of our overall footprint and expected to be particularly volatile because of its investment objective. It is currently the only fund that includes scope 3 in its decarbonisation target.
The Ninetyone Global Return Credit fund focusses on transition pathways to identify in each sector the companies with best-in-class transition plans to align with a net zero pathway.

Download the full plan as a pdf file >>

Cushon

Cushon Group Limited is registered in England and Wales with company number 10967805. Registered office: Stephenson House, 2 Cherry Orchard Road, Croydon, England, CR0 6BA. Cushon Money Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority with FRN 929465 and is registered in England and Wales with company number 11112120. Cushon Master Trust is regulated by The Pensions Regulator with PSR number 12008536. Cushon Group Limited is the sponsoring company of Cushon Master Trust and is registered in England and Wales with company number 10967805. We provide high quality impartial information but not advice, so it is important that you understand the risks of investing. The value of investments can go down as well as up which means you may get back less than you put in.